SUMMARY
This chapter discusses the constitutionality of Oregon’s Workers’ Compensation Law, pointing out cases that litigated and construed the various constitutional provisions and issues. PDF Download - After purchase go to My Content to retrieve your digital file(s).
DESCRIPTION
Chapter 2
CONSTITUTIONALITY AND STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION
Anna McFaul
Sydney A. Montanaro
Geoffrey G. Wren
§ 2.1 CONSTITUTIONALITY
§ 2.1-1 Challenges to Constitutionality of Workers’ Compensation Law
§ 2.1-2 Oregon Constitution
§ 2.1-2(a) In General
§ 2.1-2(b) Relevant State Constitutional Provisions
§ 2.1-2(b)(1) Remedy Clause
§ 2.1-2(b)(2) Jury Trial Clause
§ 2.1-2(b)(3) Privileges and Immunities Clause
§ 2.1-2(b)(4) Contract Clause
§ 2.1-2(b)(5) Separation-of-Powers Doctrine
§ 2.1-3 Federal Constitution
§ 2.1-3(a) In General
§ 2.1-3(b) Relevant Federal Constitutional Provisions
§ 2.1-3(b)(1) Due Process Clause
§ 2.1-3(b)(2) Equal Protection Clause
§ 2.1-3(b)(3) Contract Clause
§ 2.1-3(b)(4) Eleventh Amendment Immunity
§ 2.1-4 Procedures and Pitfalls for Raising Constitutional Challenges to Administrative Rules and Remedies
§ 2.1-5 Particular Cases
§ 2.2 STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION
§ 2.2-1 General Rules
§ 2.2-2 Impartial Interpretation
§ 2.2-3 Validity of Earlier Case Law Given Frequent Legislative Reforms
§ 2.2-4 Retroactivity of Statutory Changes
§ 2.2-5 Statutory Authority for Agency Rule
§ 2.2-6 Particular Cases